| These use water as refrigerant. Water is a
highly effective refrigerant (better than most CFCs, HCFCs, HFCs) but
has the disadvantage of a very low vapour density and low evaporating
pressure which makes its use in conventional vapour compression systems
impracticable. Recent attempts to overcome these problems have either
used ejectors or turbo compressors.
Ejectors typically use steam passing through an expansion nozzle to
entrain a secondary flow of water vapour from an evaporator vessel at
low pressure and raise its pressure at the ejector discharge. The
driving energy is heat to raise the steam that drives the compression
process. There are therefore few moving parts and the system can be
powered by waste heat or even solar energy. A major disadvantage is
the low efficiency of ejectors which leads to low overall COPs
(coefficient of performances). The University of Nottingham has built
a prototype system that has been installed in a building in
Leicestershire using solar panels and a back up gas fired boiler. Its
COP is only around 0.3 but this does not matter when the system is
being powered by solar energy. More crucial is the high capital cost
of the prototype although the University is investigating how ejectors
may be moulded from plastic which should reduce the cost of
manufactured systems. Figure 1 an Expansion-cooling Module |
|
| A
prototype turbo compressor system has been installed at the LEGO factory
in Denmark. This uses a two-stage turbo compressor to compress the very
high volume of water vapour needed for its 2 MW cooling capacity. As a
prototype the cost of the system was very high at around £4650 /
kW compared to £50 - £100 / kW for conventional chillers.
However, its COP is claimed to be higher than conventional R22 chillers.
It remains to be seen whether the very high capital cost could be
reduced by using modern mass production techniques.
|
|
| Back to Innovative Cooling Home Page | |